Comic Fury Webcomic Hosting - Comic profile

You are not logged in. Log in, Register, More info
Comic profile: The Science of Cookies
The Science of Cookies
Bande dessinée sur les sciences de la santé, la recherche et les cookies. Surtout les cookies.
Comic avatar
Profile
Comic language: French
Genre: Comedy
Activity status: Active
Archive url: Visit archive
Statistics
Last update: Yesterday, 3:56 PM
Number of comics: 878
Number of subscribers: 7
Visitors: 30818 visitors (156246 pages viewed)
Rating: 0 (0 votes)

Comic description

Description

The Science of Cookies est une bande dessinée en ligne (webcomic) à but non lucratif portant sur les sciences sociales et les sciences de la santé, les cookies, la révision par les pairs (peer-review), les types d'études existants, les erreurs cognitives, les biais, les statistiques, les fausses-croyances, les moyens d'avoir accès à une science de qualité, le processus de recherche, les médias, les journaux scientifiques et d'autres choses encore. Mais surtout et principalement, cela parle de cookies.

Avertissement

Mes dessins contiennent des illustrations à caractère médical. Illustrer de manière humoristique implique de simplifier de l’information et de la présenter d’une manière interprétable de différentes façons; des subtilités et des détails sont ainsi perdus et des erreurs peuvent survenir. Même si l’information est exacte, il est possible qu’elle ne puisse pas s’appliquer à votre cas particulier ou qu’elle ne soit plus à jour. Les informations contenues dans ces dessins ne peuvent ainsi pas se substituer à l’avis d’un professionnel de la santé. Les sources mentionnées en référence (et non pas le livre en lui-même) peuvent néanmoins offrir un point de départ pour une discussion avec celui-ci. L’auteur décline toute responsabilité reliée à des décisions prises en rapport au contenu de ces dessins.

[EN] Humoristic illustrations of research, medicine the health sciences and education for laypeople. Also, cookies!

Warning

My comics contain some medical information. Illustrating in a humoristic way requires simplifying information and presenting it in a form that can be interpretated in many different ways; some subtle details are thus lost and errors can appear. Even if the information is correct, it might not be applicable to your specific case or might no longer be relevant. Any information contained in those drawings cannot substitute the informed recommendations of a health professionnal. The sources I refer to can be used as starting points for a discusssion with a health professionnal. The author declines any responsibility with decisions taken related to the content of his drawings.

Authors


Most recent comments left on The Science of Cookies

Tekai
Yesterday
[EN] Training
Accidents and errors
- Okay, professionnals with more training were associated with less errors and accidents according to your study.

Training
Theory 1
Internship 1
Theory 2
Internship 2

Training
Theory 1
Internship 1
Internship 2
- But which part of their long, expensive and strenuous training DIDN'T contribute to this result?
Left on Décomposer la formation en ses parts utiles
Tekai
2 days ago
[EN] NICE 2018
Intervention 1: No reliable evidence supporting its effectiveness
Intervention 2: No reliable evidence supporting its effectiveness
...

Research
- In light of the situation I can understand why my colleagues prefer not to read research relevant to their profession.
Left on Lire les résultats de recherche les démotive
Tekai
3 days ago
[EN] - Scientific research needs collaboration to go forward..

To hire as soon as possible!
- Find the most competitive researchers and hire them!
Left on Collaboration compétitive
Tekai
3 days ago
[EN] Make the other players guess the following character:
John P.A. Ioannidis
Without using the words "a", "large", "part", "of", "health", "research", "aren't", "useful", and "unfortunately".
Left on John PA Ioannidis recherches peu utiles Taboo
Tekai
5 days ago
[EN] Basis for the claim: X
- So, what was the most common basis for claims made by your colleagues this month?

Basis for claims made by colleagues - February 2018
No source 75
...
- Quite clearly "no source mentioned".
Left on Affirmations des collègues